| Author |
Message |
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Check update |
 |
|
Guest wrote: BMa wrote: The most missing FDM feature for me is :
check update for downloaded files.
Do you plan to build this feature ? [quote="Guest"][quote="BMa"]The most missing FDM feature for me is :
check update for downloaded files.
Do you plan to build this feature ?[/quote][/quote]
|
|
|
 |
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:06 pm |
|
|
 |
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: Check update |
|
|
BMa wrote: The most missing FDM feature for me is :
check update for downloaded files.
Do you plan to build this feature ? [quote="BMa"]The most missing FDM feature for me is :
check update for downloaded files.
Do you plan to build this feature ?[/quote]
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:04 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Re: |
|
|
Let's hope some developer see this... Thanks i4u1! i4u1 wrote: It's not so hard i believe for you to code it. Why it's not present yet? You only have to check filesizes and dates of last change/modification of files. Code: WinInet:
InternetOpenUrl
InternetFindNextFile
WIN32_FIND_DATA
typedef struct _WIN32_FIND_DATA {
DWORD dwFileAttributes;
FILETIME ftCreationTime;
FILETIME ftLastAccessTime;
FILETIME ftLastWriteTime;
DWORD nFileSizeHigh;
DWORD nFileSizeLow;
DWORD dwReserved0;
DWORD dwReserved1;
TCHAR cFileName[MAX_PATH];
TCHAR cAlternateFileName[14];
}WIN32_FIND_DATA, *PWIN32_FIND_DATA, *LPWIN32_FIND_DATA; And check some fields against FindFirstFile/FindNextFile on local drive! That's all falks. Several years spent for sticking this thread and not implementing 20 lines of code. Let's hope some developer see this...
Thanks i4u1!
[quote="i4u1"]It's not so hard i believe for you to code it. Why it's not present yet?
You only have to check filesizes and dates of last change/modification of files.
[code]WinInet:
InternetOpenUrl
InternetFindNextFile
WIN32_FIND_DATA
typedef struct _WIN32_FIND_DATA {
DWORD dwFileAttributes;
FILETIME ftCreationTime;
FILETIME ftLastAccessTime;
FILETIME ftLastWriteTime;
DWORD nFileSizeHigh;
DWORD nFileSizeLow;
DWORD dwReserved0;
DWORD dwReserved1;
TCHAR cFileName[MAX_PATH];
TCHAR cAlternateFileName[14];
}WIN32_FIND_DATA, *PWIN32_FIND_DATA, *LPWIN32_FIND_DATA;[/code]
And check some fields against FindFirstFile/FindNextFile on local drive! That's all falks.
Several years spent for sticking this thread and not implementing 20 lines of code.[/quote]
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:31 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
|
|
|
It's not so hard i believe for you to code it. Why it's not present yet?
You only have to check filesizes and dates of last change/modification of files.
Code: WinInet:
InternetOpenUrl
InternetFindNextFile
WIN32_FIND_DATA
typedef struct _WIN32_FIND_DATA {
DWORD dwFileAttributes;
FILETIME ftCreationTime;
FILETIME ftLastAccessTime;
FILETIME ftLastWriteTime;
DWORD nFileSizeHigh;
DWORD nFileSizeLow;
DWORD dwReserved0;
DWORD dwReserved1;
TCHAR cFileName[MAX_PATH];
TCHAR cAlternateFileName[14];
}WIN32_FIND_DATA, *PWIN32_FIND_DATA, *LPWIN32_FIND_DATA;
And check some fields against FindFirstFile/FindNextFile on local drive! That's all falks.
Several years spent for sticking this thread and not implementing 20 lines of code. It's not so hard i believe for you to code it. Why it's not present yet?
You only have to check filesizes and dates of last change/modification of files.
[code]WinInet:
InternetOpenUrl
InternetFindNextFile
WIN32_FIND_DATA
typedef struct _WIN32_FIND_DATA {
DWORD dwFileAttributes;
FILETIME ftCreationTime;
FILETIME ftLastAccessTime;
FILETIME ftLastWriteTime;
DWORD nFileSizeHigh;
DWORD nFileSizeLow;
DWORD dwReserved0;
DWORD dwReserved1;
TCHAR cFileName[MAX_PATH];
TCHAR cAlternateFileName[14];
}WIN32_FIND_DATA, *PWIN32_FIND_DATA, *LPWIN32_FIND_DATA;[/code]
And check some fields against FindFirstFile/FindNextFile on local drive! That's all falks.
Several years spent for sticking this thread and not implementing 20 lines of code.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2009 7:36 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
|
|
|
Alex wrote: We plan to add it.
Alex,
Thanks for your effort! [quote="Alex"]We plan to add it.[/quote]
Alex,
Thanks for your effort!
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sun Apr 19, 2009 1:24 am |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
We plan to add it.
We plan to add it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Mar 23, 2009 6:40 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
Very needed feature |
|
|
|
I need this feature as well.
I need this feature as well.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:41 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
I need this feature.
I need this feature.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 17, 2009 10:36 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
|
|
|
Anonymous wrote: I don't need the update downloads feature - it's just irrelevant bloatware. Flashgot is quite good, but nowhere near the class of FDM. My FDM 2.5 works perfect every time, is stable, efficient, clean, lightweight, blindingly fast and very beautiful. I wish there was a new plugin for the new Firefox 3 though.  I Agree with you !!! [quote="Anonymous"]I don't need the update downloads feature - it's just irrelevant bloatware. Flashgot is quite good, but nowhere near the class of FDM. My FDM 2.5 works perfect every time, is stable, efficient, clean, lightweight, blindingly fast and very beautiful. I wish there was a new plugin for the new Firefox 3 though.[/quote] :D I Agree with you !!!
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 9:31 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
When can we expect this feature to be implemented?
Any developer? Please?
TIA
When can we expect this feature to be implemented?
Any developer? Please?
TIA
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 6:45 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
|
|
|
|
:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 8:55 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
|
|
|
Anonymous wrote: Anonymous wrote: Please tell, how exactly does this feature bloat anything?
As far as I am concerned, that feature is a must, and that is why I am still sticking to the old FlashGet 1.73 (newer versions are buggy as hell), and I am anxiosly waiting to see this feature in FDM. Same here, strange that its so difficult to code. Agreed! Please developers, implement this feature! [quote="Anonymous"][quote="Anonymous"]Please tell, how exactly does this feature bloat anything?
As far as I am concerned, that feature is a must, and that is why I am still sticking to the old FlashGet 1.73 (newer versions are buggy as hell), and I am anxiosly waiting to see this feature in FDM.[/quote]
Same here, strange that its so difficult to code.[/quote]
Agreed! Please developers, implement this feature!
|
|
|
|
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 2:56 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
|
|
|
Anonymous wrote: Please tell, how exactly does this feature bloat anything?
As far as I am concerned, that feature is a must, and that is why I am still sticking to the old FlashGet 1.73 (newer versions are buggy as hell), and I am anxiosly waiting to see this feature in FDM.
Same here, strange that its so difficult to code. [quote="Anonymous"]Please tell, how exactly does this feature bloat anything?
As far as I am concerned, that feature is a must, and that is why I am still sticking to the old FlashGet 1.73 (newer versions are buggy as hell), and I am anxiosly waiting to see this feature in FDM.[/quote]
Same here, strange that its so difficult to code.
|
|
|
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 3:20 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
|
|
|
Anonymous wrote: Please tell, how exactly does this feature bloat anything?
As far as I am concerned, that feature is a must, and that is why I am still sticking to the old FlashGet 1.73 (newer versions are buggy as hell), and I am anxiosly waiting to see this feature in FDM.
I think developers don't even see these requests...
I also want the "check for update" feature implemented in FDM [quote="Anonymous"]Please tell, how exactly does this feature bloat anything?
As far as I am concerned, that feature is a must, and that is why I am still sticking to the old FlashGet 1.73 (newer versions are buggy as hell), and I am anxiosly waiting to see this feature in FDM.[/quote]
I think developers don't even see these requests...
I also want the "check for update" feature implemented in FDM
|
|
|
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 1:23 pm |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Post subject: |
|
|
|
Anonymous wrote: Please update Free Download manager add on for Firefox 3.0.
Exactly that's what I am missing as well !!! And hopefully with automatic checking for FF Add-on UPDATES - like all other (newer) FF Add-ons do ! [quote="Anonymous"]Please update Free Download manager add on for Firefox 3.0.[/quote]
Exactly that's what I am missing as well !!! And hopefully with automatic checking for FF Add-on UPDATES - like all other (newer) FF Add-ons do !
|
|
|
|
Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2008 3:54 pm |
|
|
|
|
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
